News
Lime screed gains ground as a sustainable alternative to cement

Lime screed gains ground as a sustainable alternative to cement

For decades, cement screed has been the standard in residential and commercial buildings. Yet interest is growing in an ancient material making a modern comeback: lime screed. With renewed focus on sustainability and healthy indoor environments, natural hydraulic lime (NHL) is once again attracting attention across the construction sector.
31/10/2025
Continue reading

Kort samengevat

Kalkchape met RC Calcifix biedt een duurzaam alternatief voor traditionele cementchape, met vergelijkbare sterkte maar belangrijke extra voordelen:

Ecologische winst: Natuurlijke hydraulische kalk (NHL) wordt gebrand bij 900°C versus 1450°C voor cement, wat resulteert in lagere CO₂-uitstoot. NHL neemt tijdens uitharding ook CO₂ op via carbonatatie.

Bouwfysische voordelen: Kalkchape is elastischer (minder scheuren bij beweging), dampopener (natuurlijke vochtregulatie), zoutbestendiger (geen sulfaatrot) en compatibel met historische gebouwen.

Prestaties: Onafhankelijke tests door Buildwise en SGS Intron tonen dat RC Calcifix vergelijkbare druk- en buigsterkte levert als cement, met betere slijtweerstand en minimale krimp.

Verwerking: Na 3 dagen beloopbaar, na 7 dagen betegelen mogelijk met dampopen lijm (KHOLAO COLLE). Verbruik: 250 kg/m³. Ideaal voor vloerverwarming, renovatie en nieuwbouw met natuurlijke materialen.

Conclusie: Voor projecten die inzetten op lange termijn, gezond binnenklimaat en duurzaamheid is kalkchape de slimme keuze.

For decades, the traditional cement screed has been the standard in residential and commercial buildings. Yet, interest is growing in an age-old building material: lime screed.Thanks to the renewed focus on sustainability and healthy indoor environments, natural hydraulic lime (NHL) is once again in the spotlight.

Cement Screed: Strong but Environmentally Burdensome

Cement-based screeds are known for their high strength, fast curing, and easy application—making them popular among contractors and floor installers.However, several disadvantages are associated with cement:

  1. Cement screed is less ecological and less sustainable than lime screed. The production of Portland cement requires significantly more energy and generates higher CO₂ emissions than the production of natural hydraulic lime (NHL).Lime is fired at around 900°C, while cement clinker requires about 1450°C. Moreover, NHL lime reabsorbs CO₂ during curing (carbonation).
  2. Cement screed is far less flexible than lime screed. Its rigidity makes it more prone to cracking in cases of settlement, vibration, or temperature changes.Lime, with comparable compressive and tensile strength, provides elasticity to the mortar, allowing minor movements to be absorbed without cracking. This results in a healthier indoor climate and improves the durability of surface finishes.
  3. Cement screed is much less vapour-permeable than lime screed. In cases of rising damp, this can cause rapid deterioration of the screed and lead to moisture migrating into walls, resulting in flaking paint, plaster damage, and mould growth. Lime, by contrast, allows vapour to pass through, enabling moisture to evaporate naturally.
  4. Cement screed is more sensitive to salts than lime screed. Cement contains calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) and aluminates, which can react chemically with salts present in soil moisture or clay bricks. Sulphates, in particular, can trigger ettringite formation, causing expansion (sulphate attack) and internal stress, eventually leading to cracking, delamination, and disintegration. Saint-Astier’s natural hydraulic lime contains virtually no reactive aluminates and does not react with sulphates. Its breathable nature also allows salts such as nitrates and chlorides to migrate toward the surface and crystallize externally, preventing internal pressure and damage.
  5. Cement screed is incompatible with historic buildings, while lime screed is not. Because cement screed is harder and denser than traditional materials like brick, natural stone, or lime mortar, stresses can occur at junctions between floors and walls. This often leads to cracks, detachment of plaster, or even structural damage. Lime screed, on the other hand, is both physically and chemically compatible with historic materials.

Lime Screed: Breathable and Ecological

While cement screeds remain common due to their quick curing and high compressive strength, they pose significant risks in damp or heritage contexts. Lime screeds, made with a binder based on natural hydraulic lime (NHL), provide a sustainable and physically balanced alternative. They combine high compressive and flexural strength with vapour-permeable and moisture-regulating properties, allowing moisture and salts to be naturally expelled. The result: a more stable floor, reduced cracking, a healthier indoor environment, and a considerably longer lifespan for both floor and building.

Technical Comparison: Lime Screed vs. Cement Screed

The following values are based on test reports from Buildwise (DE-BE-0180 / DE-SW-0037, 2024) and SGS Intron (report 243503). These independent tests confirm that ecological lime screeds using RC Calcifix perform fully on par with traditional cement-based systems — offering additional advantages in durability, moisture resistance, salt resistance, shrinkage behaviour, and abrasion resistance.

Property Cement screed Lime screed (RC Calcifix)
Composition CEM II/A + sand 0/4 RC Calcifix + sand 0/4
Compressive strength (28 d) 8.3 N/mm² 8.7 N/mm²
Compressive strength (90 d) 8.3 N/mm² 12.9 N/mm²
Flexural strength (28 d) 2.3 N/mm² 2.3 N/mm²
Flexural strength (90 d) 2.3 N/mm² 3.5 N/mm²
Hardening (walkable) 24–48 h 3 days walkable
Hardening (fully cured) 28 days 60–90 days (less shrinkage)
Free shrinkage (28 d) -0.098% -0.074%
Wear resistance (Böhme – 16 cycles) 7.9 mm 4 mm

Practical Application

Cement screeds are appreciated for their rapid application and familiarity in the construction sector.

However, lime screeds with RC Calcifix are now equally practical thanks to their optimized formulation. The mortar can be applied using standard screed pumps and tools. After levelling and smoothing, the screed is walkable after approximately three days. When using vapour-permeable adhesives (e.g. KHOLAO COLLE) and grout (e.g. KHOLAO JOINT), tiling can begin after seven days.

The extended final curing period (60–90 days) occurs without noticeable shrinkage or stress, reducing the risk of cracking or curling. This makes lime screeds particularly suitable for underfloor heating and renovations on sensitive substrates.

Consumption figures:

  • Cement screed: 250–350 kg cement binder/m³
  • RC Calcifix: 250 kg lime binder/m³

The lower binder consumption translates to reduced raw material and energy use per square meter of floor — directly contributing to the ecological benefits of the system.

Applications and Added Value

Lime screeds prove their worth in both renovation and restoration projects as well as modern ecological new builds. Thanks to their breathable nature, they are ideal for projects where moisture regulation, compatibility with natural materials, and sustainability are priorities.

Their low shrinkage, good thermal conductivity, and natural moisture buffering also make them an excellent choice in combination with underfloor heating or bio-based insulation materials such as hemp-lime.

A Matter of Choice

While cement screeds remain suitable for projects where speed and early strength are key—such as industrial floors or fast-track construction—lime screed with RC Calcifix offers clear advantages for those thinking long-term.

It contributes to comfort, durability, and energy efficiency, perfectly aligning with the shift toward a circular building economy where materials are reusable, healthy, and environmentally responsible.

Laurent Châtel
Commercial Director
bij Reynchemie
Share this post
Sign up for our newsletter
* Verplicht

Need a quote or personal advice?

Our experienced advisors will provide you with personal advice on site.

Vaak gestelde vragen

Heb je nog vragen na het lezen van dit artikel? Geen probleem, je kan de meest gestelde vragen hier vinden. Niet gevonden wat je wou weten?

Contacteer ons en wij helpen je graag verder.

Wat is het verschil tussen kalkchape en cementchape?

Kalkchape gebruikt natuurlijke hydraulische kalk (NHL) als bindmiddel, terwijl cementchape cement gebruikt. Het belangrijkste verschil zit in de eigenschappen: kalkchape is dampopen, elastischer en duurzamer. Kalk wordt gebrand bij 900°C versus 1450°C voor cement, wat resulteert in 40% minder CO₂-uitstoot. Kalkchape kan bewegen zonder scheuren en laat vocht natuurlijk evacueren, terwijl cementchape harder en minder ademend is.

Wanneer gebruik je kalkchape in plaats van cementchape?

Kalkchape is de beste keuze bij renovatie van historische gebouwen, bij vochtige ondergronden met opstijgend vocht, in combinatie met vloerverwarming, en bij projecten waar duurzaamheid centraal staat. Ook bij aanwezigheid van zouten in de ondergrond (sulfaten, nitraten) is kalkchape superieur omdat het geen sulfaatrot ontwikkelt. Voor snelle projecten waarbij de vloer binnen 24-48 uur beloopbaar moet zijn, is cementchape praktischer.

Hoe lang moet kalkchape drogen voordat je erop kunt lopen?

Kalkchape met RC Calcifix is na 3 dagen beloopbaar. Na 7 dagen kun je betegelen met dampopen lijmmortel zoals KHOLAO COLLE. De volledige uitharding duurt 60 tot 90 dagen, maar dit verloopt zonder merkbare krimp of spanningen. Dit is langzamer dan cementchape (24-48 uur beloopbaar), maar de langere uitharding vermindert het risico op scheuren aanzienlijk.

Is kalkchape geschikt voor vloerverwarming?

Ja, kalkchape is uitstekend geschikt voor vloerverwarming. Door de lagere krimp (0,074% versus 0,098% bij cement), goede warmtegeleiding en natuurlijke vochtbuffering werkt het zelfs beter dan cementchape in combinatie met vloerverwarming. Het risico op scheuren en schotelvorming door temperatuurschommelingen is veel kleiner dankzij de elastische eigenschappen van kalk.

Waarom is kalkchape beter voor historische gebouwen?

Kalkchape is fysisch en chemisch compatibel met traditionele bouwmaterialen zoals oude baksteen, natuursteen en kalkmortel. Cementchape is harder en dichter dan deze historische materialen, waardoor er spanningen ontstaan die leiden tot scheurvorming en schade aan het metselwerk. Kalkchape heeft vergelijkbare eigenschappen als de originele materialen, waardoor vloer en muren als één geheel kunnen bewegen zonder schade. Bovendien laat de dampopenheid van kalk vocht natuurlijk evacueren, essentieel in oude gebouwen zonder dampscherm.